SUS - the questionnaire for evaluating usability

SUS the questionnaire for evaluating usability

With our survey template, you can quickly and reliably assess the usability of your software or tools. The standardized SUS questionnaire provides clear results that are easy to interpret and compare with other systems.

Immobilienscout 24 ist begeisterter easyfeedback Nutzer

“Identifying user needs is at the heart of our business. easyfeedback has been helping us with this task for several years now. We particularly appreciate its intuitive usability and professional support.”

Franziska Becker
Guild Lead User Experience Research
TUI ist begeisterter easyfeedback Nutzer

“We use easyfeedback for internal and external surveys—it’s fast, convenient, and easy! The uncomplicated and friendly support puts a smile on our faces, and we are delighted with the continuous development of the platform.”

Jennifer Fischer
Guest & Competitor Insights Analyst

How does the SUS questionnaire support usability evaluation?

Good usability is characterized by simplicity, clarity, and efficiency. When these factors come together, using a system feels intuitive and enjoyable.

To ensure that this is not just a claim but can be continuously verified, short and reliable surveys are needed.

This is where the System Usability Scale (SUS) comes in: with just ten questions, it quickly and accurately measures how user-friendly a piece of software or tool is perceived to be.

The result is a clear score that is easy to interpret and compare with other systems.

With easyfeedback, the SUS questionnaire is already available to you as a free template.

Simply sign up, deploy it, and start collecting valuable user feedback right away — with no extra effort.

And if you’d like to gain deeper insights into the user experience later on, you can flexibly expand your survey with additional questionnaires at any time.

Contents of the template:

  • Assessment of how user-friendly a system, tool, or software is
  • Questions about user behavior
  • Prioritization of system aspects
  • Open-ended questions about opportunities for improvement
  • NPS survey

Objectives of the survey:

  • Measuring usability
  • Identifying weaknesses
  • Continuous improvement
  • Increasing user satisfaction

Helpful features for the survey:

  • Survey options: Anonymous, partially anonymous, personalized
  • Invitation options: Link, email, QR code, and more
  • Segment analysis based on survey groups or response patterns
DSGVO-konforme Online-Umfragen

Data protection „made in Germany“ (GDPR)

Anonyme Teilnahme an Umfragen

Anonymity function for honest feedback

Frequently asked questions about the SUS

The SUS (System Usability Scale) is a standardized questionnaire used to evaluate the usability of systems, products, websites, or software.

It was developed by John Brooke in 1986 and remains a widely used, quick, and robust method in usability research.

Structure

The SUS consists of 10 statements (items) relating to usability and complexity.

Participants rate each statement on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).

Examples of items:

  • “I find the system unnecessarily complex.”
  • “I think that I would like to use this system.”

 

Evaluation

The responses are converted into points according to a predefined scoring method.

The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible usability.

As a rough guideline:

      • < 50 points → very poor usability
      • ~ 68 points → average
      • > 80 points → very good usability

 

Advantages

  • Very easy and quick to use
  • Works independently of the type of system being evaluated (software, hardware, website, etc.)
  • Enables comparisons between different products or versions

In the context of UX (User Experience), the System Usability Scale (SUS) is a widely used tool for quickly and consistently measuring the usability of a system.

It provides quantitative data that helps UX teams evaluate the quality of user interaction from the users’ perspective.

Purpose in UX

  • SUS measures how easy, efficient, and pleasant a system is to use.
  • It complements qualitative UX methods such as interviews, observations, and usability tests with a measurable score.
  • This enables teams to prioritize improvements and compare different design versions.

 

Integration into the UX Process

  • Early in prototyping: SUS can be administered after initial test runs to identify major usability issues.
  • During development: Regular SUS assessments help evaluate the impact of design changes on usability.
  • After launch: SUS can be used to determine whether the system is genuinely user-friendly and whether UX goals have been achieved.

 

Benefits for UX Designers

  • Simple and quick: Only 10 questions that are easy to complete.
  • Comparability: The standardized scale enables comparisons between systems, versions, or user groups.
  • Objective basis: Complements subjective impressions gathered through qualitative UX methods.
  • Identification of weaknesses: Analyzing individual questions can help identify specific problem areas.

 

Example of Use

  • A UX team tests an app prototype with 20 users.
  • Each participant completes the SUS questionnaire.
  • The evaluation results in a score of 62 → below average, indicating a need for optimization.
  • The team combines the SUS results with observations from usability tests to plan specific improvements.

 

In short: SUS is a practical, standardized UX tool that makes usability measurable, supports quick decision-making, and helps teams prioritize improvements effectively.

Here, we explain step by step how to use a SUS questionnaire (System Usability Scale):

1. Step: Preparation

Decide which system (e.g., a website, app, software, or prototype) you want to test.

Make sure that participants can try out or familiarize themselves with the system before answering the questionnaire.

2. Step: Administration

Give participants the SUS questionnaire with the 10 statements.

Participants rate each statement on a Likert scale from 1 to 5:

  • 1 = strongly disagree
  • 5 = strongly agree

The items alternate between positively and negatively worded statements to avoid response bias.

Examples:

  • Positive: “I think that I would like to use the system regularly.”
  • Negative: “I find the system unnecessarily complex.”

 

3. Step: Evaluation

  • For odd-numbered items (1, 3, 5, 7, 9): subtract 1 from the value.
  • For even-numbered items (2, 4, 6, 8, 10): calculate 5 − value.

 

Add up all adjusted values → this results in a number between 0 and 40.
Result × 2.5 → gives the SUS score between 0 and 100.

4. Step: Interpretation

  • < 50 → very poor usability
  • ~ 68 → average
  • 80 → very good usability

 

Important: The SUS score is not a percentage, but a comparative measure. It is generally used to compare different systems, versions, or target groups.

Short example:
A participant rates Item 1 (“I would like to use the system”) with a 4 → (odd-numbered item) → 4 − 1 = 3 points.
The same calculation is performed for all items, then the points are added together and multiplied by 2.5.

The SUS questions (System Usability Scale) are a standardized set of 10 questions used to evaluate the usability of a system, software, or website.

They are formulated to cover both positive and negative aspects of usability.

Structure of the SUS Questions

  • 10 questions in total

 

  • Response scale from 1 to 5:
    • 1 = “strongly disagree”
    • 5 = “strongly agree”

 

  • Odd-numbered questions (1, 3, 5, 7, 9): positively worded → higher values = better

 

  • Even-numbered questions (2, 4, 6, 8, 10): negatively worded → higher values = worse

 

Topics covered:

  • General usability – e.g., “I find the system easy to use.”
  • Complexity / difficulty – e.g., “I find the system unnecessarily complex.”
  • Consistency and learning – e.g., “I think that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.”
  • Confidence and error prevention – e.g., “I feel very confident using the system.”
  • Integration into the workflow – e.g., “I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.”

 

The SUS questions are intentionally kept general so that they can be applied to any type of software or digital system.

After completion, the responses are adjusted, summed, and combined into a SUS score between 0 and 100.

The System Usability Scale (SUS) score is a proven tool for evaluating the usability of software, websites, or digital applications.

It makes it possible to measure usability objectively and compare different systems with one another.

The SUS score is calculated in five clear steps that are easy to understand even for users without a statistical background.

 

1. Step: Collect responses

First, users are asked to answer 10 standardized questions.

Each question is rated on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “strongly disagree” and 5 means “strongly agree.”

The questions cover various aspects of usability, such as efficiency, convenience, learning effort, and confidence in the system.

 

2. Step: Adjust the values

After collecting the responses, the values must be adjusted for the calculation:

  • Odd-numbered questions (1, 3, 5, 7, 9): subtract 1 from the response value.
    Example: Response “4” → 4 – 1 = 3.

 

  • Even-numbered questions (2, 4, 6, 8, 10): subtract the response value from 5.
    Example: Response “2” → 5 – 2 = 3.

This step ensures that all sub-scores are interpreted in the same direction, meaning that higher values always reflect better usability.

 

3. Step: Add up the sub-scores

Next, all adjusted values are added together.

The result is a number between 0 and 40.

This intermediate step combines the subjective ratings of the individual SUS questions into a single sub-score.

 

4. Step: Multiplication

To convert the SUS score to the standard scale from 0 to 100, the sum is multiplied by 2.5.

This produces a comparable value that can be easily interpreted.

 

5. Step: Interpretation

The final SUS score ranges from 0 to 100.

A score above 68 is considered above average and indicates that the system has good usability. Scores below 68 indicate that there is room for improvement.

It is important to note that the SUS score is not a percentage, but a relative comparison value.

It is used to objectively compare different systems, software versions, or interface designs.

A good SUS score is generally above 68 – this value is considered the international average.

Anything above this indicates above-average usability.

Guidelines for evaluation:

  • 85–100: Excellent
    Users perceive the system as very user-friendly and intuitive. Only minor improvements are needed.

 

  • 70–84: Good
    The usability is solid and reliable. The system works smoothly, while minor optimizations can further improve the user experience.

 

  • 50–69: Average
    The system is generally usable, but there are noticeable obstacles. Optimization is recommended to prevent user frustration.

 

  • Below 50: Weak
    There is a significant need for improvement. Users experience difficulties that can lead to abandonment or inefficient use.

 

Guidelines for evaluation:

  • The SUS score is not a percentage, but a comparative value. It helps evaluate systems, versions, or interfaces against one another.

 

  • A “good” score depends heavily on the context of use:
      • For simple consumer applications, a score of 80+ is often expected.
      • For complex professional systems, a score of 70 may already be above average and indicate very good usability compared with the industry average.

The interpretation of a SUS questionnaire aims to evaluate the usability of a system and identify weaknesses.

Here is a detailed explanation:

1. Step: Understand the SUS score

The SUS score ranges from 0 to 100.

Important note: It is not a percentage, but a relative comparison value used to compare systems or versions with one another.

2. Step: Guidelines for interpretation

  • 85–100: Excellent – users perceive the system as very user-friendly.
  • 70–84: Good – usability is solid, with room for minor improvements.
  • 50–69: Average – the system works, but there is room for improvement.
  • Below 50: Weak – significant improvements are needed, and users may experience difficulties.
  • Above 68 is generally considered above average. Anything below this indicates that usability should be improved.

 

3. Step: Analyze the individual questions

  • Analyze individual responses to identify which areas were rated particularly positively or negatively.
  • Odd-numbered questions often relate to positive aspects, while even-numbered questions often relate to negative aspects.
  • This makes it possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the system.

 

4. Step: Compare groups

  • Subgroups (e.g., by age, experience, or user type) can be compared to identify target-group-specific issues.
  • Different versions of the system can also be compared directly.

 

5. Step: Visualization

  • Charts (e.g., bar charts, box plots, or heatmaps) help present the results clearly.
  • This allows the team to quickly identify where optimizations are most urgently needed.

 

6. Step: Derive measures

  • High SUS scores → confirmation of good usability.
  • Low scores → targeted optimizations at problematic touchpoints.
  • Combining the results with qualitative feedback (comments) provides concrete ideas for improvement.

There are industry-specific benchmarking scores for the System Usability Scale (SUS) that can serve as guidelines for evaluating the usability of a system compared with other products or industry standards.

Cross-industry average values

A comprehensive analysis of more than 500 studies shows that the average SUS score is 68, with a standard deviation of 12.5.

This means that approximately half of the systems tested achieved a score above 68, while the other half scored below it.

Digital Health Apps

A meta-analysis of 117 SUS scores from 114 digital health applications found an average score of 76.64.

However, it was found that physical activity apps skewed the overall result, with an average score of 83.28, as they demonstrated significantly higher usability scores.

Consumer Software

A study of consumer software products found an average SUS score of 76, with scores ranging from 58 to 88.

This suggests that many consumer software products offer above-average usability.

Electronic Health Records (EHR)

An example from the field of electronic health records shows that a system with a SUS score of 78 is significantly above the industry average and therefore offers a high level of usability.

Interpretation of SUS scores

  • 85–100: Excellent – users perceive the system as very user-friendly.
  • 70–84: Good – usability is solid, with room for minor improvements.
  • 50–69: Average – the system works, but there is room for improvement.
  • Below 50: Weak – significant improvements are needed, and users may experience difficulties.
  • Above 68 is generally considered above average. Anything below this indicates that usability should be improved.

 

A score above 68 is generally considered above average. Scores below this value indicate room for improvement.

easyfeedback can significantly simplify the evaluation of usability using the SUS (System Usability Scale) as an online survey tool.

Here is an overview of how it works:

Easy integration of the SUS questionnaire

  • easyfeedback enables you to create digital questionnaires.
  • You can directly add the 10 standardized SUS questions, including the 1–5 scale.
  • The platform supports both positively and negatively worded statements, ensuring that the score can be calculated correctly.
  • Template available: The SUS questionnaire is ready to use and can be customized if required.

 

Automatic collection of responses

  • Participants can conveniently answer the questions online, on mobile devices, or via email link.
  • All responses are collected centrally and stored systematically.
  • Errors in data collection are avoided.
  • Applications: Suitable both after usability tests and during live operation of systems.

 

Visualization and analysis

  • The results can be displayed graphically, for example:
      • Average scores per question
      • Overall scores
      • Comparison of different user groups or system versions
  • This allows you to quickly identify and prioritize weaknesses.

 

Real-time results & export

  • Results are available in real time.
  • Export to Excel, PDF, or CSV for further processing or documentation.
  • Perfect for UX reports or presentations to the project team.

 

Benefits for UX designers

  • Time savings: Automatic calculation and visualization of SUS results.
  • Centralized data: All responses in one place, easy to export for reports.
  • Objective evaluation: Standardized method for measuring usability.
  • Flexibility: Online, mobile, or email surveys are possible.

More customer survey templates

Survey-Template-Measure Customer Satisfaction

Customer Satisfaction

Survey template details

Survey Template: Website-Feedback

Website Feedback

Survey template details

UEQ User Experience Questionnaire template

User Experience Questionnaire

Survey template details

Survey Template: Product satisfaction

Product Satisfaction

Survey template details

Survey Template: Customer Cancellation

Customer Cancellation

Survey template details

Explore all survey templates  

You are in professional company

Immoscout 24 Logo
Tui Logo
Porsche Logo
Lufthansa Logo
Jaegermeister Logo

Over 740,000 participants in easyfeedback surveys every month

Result

STUDIO

The performance add-on for your analysis

easyfeedback Result Studio 2